Friday, February 10, 2012

Seriously? I'm not poor enough?

Allow me to explain. If you've been reading for a while you may recall that I am not a rich person. In fact, I continue to astound myself by not going broke. Yet, despite living well below the poverty line for the entirety of my adult life thus far (which is only a few years, yes, but I'm sure that if someone told you you had to live on between $10,000 and $13,000 a year for a few years you'd find it a daunting prospect) I've also managed to continue to be surprised when I find out that I'm not poor enough. The first shock was when I applied for Mainecare (the local version of Medicare) a few years ago and despite making less than two hundred dollars a week (at the time) I was denied coverage not for age restrictions (being nineteen at the time I was under the twenty-one year age limit imposed on 'people like me') but because my 'head of household' (which was myself) made too much money for me to qualify for Mainecare. I don't know how poor you have to be to qualify for Mainecare as a single person under the age of twenty-one but I think it would be hard to work at all (I was working part time for minimum wage and wasn't poor enough) and manage to qualify.

I got my second shock when I did my 2010 tax return. A few factoids before the big reveal: I had never made more than ten thousand dollars in a year before 2010. I never claimed myself as a dependent before 2010. I never lived with anyone but my parents before 2010. I never tried to balance paying rent and buying food and going to work (not to mention finding work during that tough economic time) and everything else but I managed it somehow. And in 2010 I made a whopping $10,044 for the entire year. I would like to point out that this is significantly less than, say, a Senator might get for a speaking engagement at a college graduation just for comparison. On that ten thousand dollars I paid over six hundred dollars in taxes to state and federal government. On my tax return I claimed myself as a dependent and nothing else because I don't own a house or vehicle, have any other dependents, and though I had qualified medical expenses I might have deducted (two visits to a eye doctor and a year's worth of prescription contact lenses) that I paid for out-of-pocket they didn't add up to a large enough percentage of my income to count (in fact, if I had medical expenses that were a large enough percentage of my income to qualify I wouldn't have enough money to pay them so that they would qualify). I was shocked to discover that making that extra $45 that put me over $10,000 had cost me literally hundreds of dollars in tax returns.

One of my roommates at the time, filing singly, with herself as her only dependent (she had a child but he was claimed as a dependent by his other parent) and no other deduction claims than the ones I made in that year earned a little less than ten thousand dollars and got back every bit of her tax money. Up until this point in time I had as well. In fact, one year even though I was a dependent, after filing my tax return (which I have done myself every year since I started working on my sixteenth birthday) I received not only everything I had paid in taxes back to me but also a additional 'stimulus' check of three hundred dollars courtesy of former President Bush's stimulus package. I was not impressed that even though I was living well below the poverty line for a single person (to the tune of several thousand dollars below) and had only just nudged above ten thousand dollars I still paid in hundreds of dollars I did not get back.

Last year around this time of year I heard that the government was changing tax law so that rather than the involuntary savings program it is now for a lot of poor adults and minors those same people would be receiving a 'little more in every paycheck' because they would be paying 2% less (I will admit I do not know whether they meant 2% less of their gross income or 2% less than the amount they would have otherwise paid) toward Social Security. I think at the time I thought that sounded sort of reasonable (especially as I do not believe in the Social Security system as it stands and possibly not even if it was given the massive overhaul many people think it desperately needs) since having taxes act as an involuntary savings plan for the poor is not only silly but likely it is costly to those taxpayers who foot the bill for all the bureaucracy involved. However, after having done my taxes this year I am entirely unimpressed by the '2% less' plan.

When I did my 2011 taxes I got my latest shock. I made $12,660 last year (a significant increase if you do 'percentage of increase' math but if you instead make it a percentage of, say, how much money some congress-person spent remodeling the bathroom of their office at taxpayer expense it is quite a small percentage) and paid about $1,252 between state and local taxes. After getting done doing my taxes and looking at what the website calculated that my expected tax return would be I literally thought 'there must be some mistake'. I contacted the website's help service via instant messenger and asked them to give me a reason that my expected tax return was so much less than the previous year even though I only made a little more money and paid about twice as much in total taxes. I was informed that actually in 2010 I qualified for and received a tax credit called 'Making Work Pay' which was available to anyone that had earned over $3,000 in that year and that this year the program had been discontinued in favor of the '2% less' plan. I was doubly astounded by the implications of this. Because not only did this mean that I was really only getting back $25 (no, there are not meant to be any zeroes after the numeral '5' in case you were wondering) of the $1,058 I paid the federal government in taxes but that if I hadn't qualified for the 'Making Work Pay' tax credit in 2010 I would have received hundreds of dollars less in tax returns. I don't know how much less I would have received in tax returns but according to the IRS website as a single person I was eligible for up to $400 in tax credits and the total amount I got back was less than that so... I'm sure you can do the math.

The state of Maine government, unlike the federal government, was nice enough to refund me $115 of the $195 total I paid in state income tax. The state of Maine government also nicely asked me if I would like $3 of the money they were already keeping (not additionally) to go directly toward the state's clean election fund (I would because not only am I in favor of clean elections but also because that's three dollars less money that could potentially be used on a frivolous taxpayer-funded project like remodeling someone's never-to-be-seen-by-the-public bathroom). I don't really know why the state of Maine government refunded me over half my income tax money (though I assume it must be because of my total income level) but there was no gimicky tax credit or '2% less' plan that was touted to 'stimulate' the economy involved. It was sheerly 'this is how much you paid us and this is how much we feel you deserve to get back'. I am OK with that state of Maine the only thing that would make me happier is if you allowed me to tick little boxes to let you know where I want all of the money you deign to keep to go. Yes, I'd like to check the 'education' box, the 'infrastructure' box, and the 'tourism advocacy' box but count me out for the 'administrative overhead' (ie 'potential bathroom remodeling fund') and 'welfare benefits for unwed mothers who-moved-to-the-state-just-to-get-'free'-money' boxes.

Speaking of 'where my taxes are going' I decided to look at the breakdown of what I was paying in taxes between state and local income tax as well as social security and medicare. I had never looked before because I had never particularly cared but since I was already so worked up over the fact that I wasn't poor enough to get even a significant amount (roughly 2.4% of what I paid the federal government is simply not 'significant') of the money I paid in back I wanted to know who was getting that money. To the state of Maine I paid (as I mentioned previously) $195 in income tax. To the federal government I paid $342 in income tax. I want to state now that income tax is actually the thing to which I object the least (even though that money could be spent on a cushy toilet seat for some already well-padded govermental behind) because there is the possibility (however slight) that some of that money will contribute to education or improving roads or some other worthy project. I admit, again, that I would like to be able to tell the government what kinds of things they are allowed to spend my tax money on (or even just 50% of it- I would be happy knowing that 50% of my tax money is definitely going toward education and clean elections and they can spend the other 50% on 'administrative overhead' or blowing people up if they want) but overall income tax is the least objectionable portion of the taxes I paid.

If you add up my income tax amounts you'll find they come out to $537. Now, let me remind you that I paid a total of $1,252 which means I paid less than 43% of my taxes in income taxes. If you're like me you might be wondering 'what the fuck did that other 57% go toward'? I apologize for the expletive but I swear a lot inside my head especially at things which do not seem to be rational in any way. About 15% of my taxes ($183) went toward Medicare which I am not poor enough to qualify for. I'm too poor to get my own health insurance, I obviously (obvious because if I did get a benefit like that I would get paid more than minimum wage) do not work for a company which provides it, I literally could not spend a high enough percentage of my income to deduct medical expenses from my taxes, I could very well have used that $183 toward a visit to the dentist (or an eye doctor, neurologist, or chiropractor any of whom provide a service I might have liked to purchase but could not in the last year) and yet instead I subsidized someone else's visit to the dentist. But I'm young and in relatively good health so the $183 toward Medicare is not the part that makes me the most upset. The part that makes me the most upset is that I paid  42% of my total taxes toward Social Security. In fact, I only paid $5 less toward Social Security than I did in total income taxes and if we're only talking about federal taxes Social Security ate up just over half my taxes.

I already mentioned that I don't like the Social Security system. The only good thing it's ever done for this country is make people happier about being assigned a identification number but I think we can all agree that public goodwill toward the government about something as little as that isn't worth the money. I don't think the Social Security system should have been implemented to begin with. It obviously wasn't cooked up by anyone with a basic grasp of math because the lack of sustainability in such a system is glaringly obvious after a couple quick calculations. Yes, I understand that you only get it if you pay into it but people that receive it usually (with the exception of those who die in a timely manner) get more money out of it (even considering inflation) than they ever paid into it. Most people receiving social security now are likely to receive benefits for longer than they were a part of the taxpaying workforce. The only way the Social Security system could ever be sustainable is if the taxpaying population increased exponentially forever and since that obviously is not sustainable the Social Security system cannot and should not be sustained. I don't care if we abolish it now because I'm never going to receive Social Security benefits anyway. It simply isn't going to happen. I would be more than happy to sign a special government waiver stating that I will never collect Social Security and in the event that I am incapacitated to the point that they would be forced to spend it on me the government is welcome to save the taxpayers some money and pull the plug on me. But only if that meant I wouldn't have to pay into it. In fact, the prospect of having to pay into social security my whole life (or even the next two decades of it before the amount of social security/pensions/medicare/medicaid that the government pays out becomes equal to the whole amount of taxes that everyone pays in) depresses me so much that if I had proof of the afterlife I'd break out the ol' shotgun right now and kill myself in grand irony so that not only will Social Security not get my earnings but also so that some taxpayer funded criminal investigation service has to use resources looking into the 'suspicious nature' of my death.

Even though I seriously live well below the poverty line I still managed to pay rent to live somewhere (I live in an apartment mind you and not with some caring relative), I still managed to pay for all my own food (though I could have qualified for and received food stamp benefits), I still managed to pay for electricity, I still managed to pay for my cellphone service, I still managed to pay for 'premium' cable internet, I still managed to bring my bank balance up from three digits to four in the last year, I still managed to buy people Christmas and birthday presents, and I even managed to have a little fun while remaining completely debt-free and financially-independent of my parents and the government. I managed all of that with thousands of dollars less than what is considered 'poverty'. Yet despite the fact that I made thousands of dollars less than 'poverty' I also managed to pay about 10% of my income in taxes. And despite the fact that I made thousands of dollars less than 'poverty' I am seriously not poor enough to qualify for health insurance which I could not get any other way and I'm seriously not poor enough to get back a significant portion of the taxes which I pay yet I seriously subsidized someone else's healthcare and I seriously subsidized someone else's retirement and I seriously paid money that could well go to purchase a toilet seat to cushion some bureaucratic governmental behind. Apparently I am a very serious person- but not seriously poor enough.

5 comments:

  1. Collected Pixel DustFebruary 13, 2012 at 3:47 PM

    You have my sympathies... although I'm not able to have real empathy since I live a completely different life and cannot fathom what it'd be like to be poor and yet not be poor enough.
    I agree that social security is a bumpkin, giving away money to people who don't need it and can still work (unless some doctor verifies that they're disabled, I'm not buying it) just because they've reached a certain age? The money that goes into social security would be better spent in better medical care and home assistance for the sick, dying elderly.
    The elderly don't need money to live a good life, what they need is for their children who are now fully able adults to pay them back by taking care of them so that they pass away peacefully and with their loved ones instead of living alone like a hermit... I really never understood the concept that the government is supposed to take care of adults when the institution of "family" has existed before the dawn of civilization.
    Seriously, do healthy people really need to retire? I mean, if it's within ones own means, sure why not? But if one can't, wouldn't it be prudent to pool ones resources with people who actually love you and not with strangers who couldn't care less about someone else's money since they're not footing the bill? (seriously, social security goes to EVERYONE who's old even the healthy millionaires who can blow it all away on vacations knowing that social security has your back.)
    If anything, social security is a policy that replaces the loving family with the indifferent government.
    And yet, it's pretty great that one can live beneath the official poverty line and yet can still be above true poverty (the poverty in which you starve and start dying from horrible conditions). No wonder why people keep coming to the US despite the high levels of poverty and legal discrimination.
    It's a shame that you and your parents are seemingly estranged. Social security allows parents to subsist without the approval of anyone but their biased selves.
    I'm pretty sure no one thinks their corrupt even when it's obvious there's some conspicuous spending going about. But cheer up lad, life gets better and the money problems do eventually go away if one doesn't fall into the debt trap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Social security should be taken out along with most other government programs. Here we have you as living proof that you can have little money and not be entirely dependent on them taking care of you. Dependency takes away any sort of drive to work harder and do better because, like I've heard from someone at the DPS, I'm not poor enough to get more money from the government or government healthcare plans or whatever so I'm going to not take as many hours so that I don't make as much. We just need to take the government programs and privatize privatize privatize. Jobs will be given to people and service will become better because there is COMPETITION among similar companies. They want your business, so they will treat you well...unlike the government where the employees know that they won't get fired and there's no other private service offered so they'll treat you however they want because you have no choice.

    I can't stand it when people hate on "rich people" though. They're rich for a reason. They're hard-working people that had goals and a dream and did well in life and advanced in their job, living the "American Dream" and eventually became rich only to be punished by the government for that reason. You make so much more money than a bunch of other people so you'll have to pay more taxes to..."spread the wealth" because it's just not fair that you have so much. Sure, you worked really hard to get where you are today...and sure, those other people refused more hours to get government money...but you're now obligated to give them your hard earned cash. Why are the rich people talked about like evil people? Rich people are the ones that pay the vast majority of all taxes and the ones that fund these retarded programs. Why can't people just pay the same percentage in taxes. Flat tax. Rich people are still paying more, but only because they make more.

    Now about social security...We get rid of it...use the remainder of the money (if there's even any left) for the people who really need it and have everyone else save on their own. Or...have some sort of opt-out system where a percentage of your paycheck goes into an account for your own personal retirement. No one else can touch it or eat it up like the government does now.

    Basically...I'm extremely anti-big-government. I'm not rich, and I'm not poor enough to qualify for FAFSA to help me through school...but when I become rich one day I want to willingly choose to donate to the poor and needy rather than to have it forcefully taken by the government.

    [/rant]

    ReplyDelete
  3. And here I was worried that no one would like this post because it was long and on a very weighty topic with the only levity confined to toilet-related humor.

    The government really doesn't exist to take care of us. I have to agree with both of your sentiments about it even though you're not in similar situations to my own.

    I also wanted to mention that I'm not actually estranged from my parents. I'm twenty-one and I moved out when I was nineteen. But the reason that I'm financially-independent of them is because they don't have a lot of money, either. But the mere fact of their existence counts against me on certain things such as if I did decide to indebt myself to go to college I likely would not be eligible for FASFA because they would look at my parents' income and assume that they can pay a large portion of my tuition. Not only can they not afford that but I wouldn't ask them to. Also, my mother is a school teacher (who may or may not receive a pension if she ever retires but by sheer virtue of the fact that she is a school teacher will never receive Social Security) and my father is a commercial fisherman (which counts as self-employment and I'm fairly certain he won't be getting Social Security either).

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can relate. I applied for food stamps because I can barely eat, and working at Walmart for about $10,000 / year and being a student, I couldn't qualify.

    I honestly don't care that much that I couldn't get food stamps. What I do care about is that I can't make enough money to eat any decent food and still have time to go to school. I mean, I could work full time and go to school full time, have no time to sleep and no time for friends at all, but what kind of a life is that? I would rather give up eating....

    Right now, I can only really eat and stay alive because of my parents. Every week when I go visit them, I raid their fridge for anything that I can find, especially their peanut butter and bread. But unless they specifically go and get my stuff to fill my fridge with, it's usually pretty empty, and so is my stomach. =(

    I just wish I could get paid more or could find a better job or something. I'm just holding out until I graduate next year in May so that I can apply for a PhD and get an RA/TA position and get paid doing the sort of things I love..... -,-

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh hell, I might as well toss in my $0.02 as well. :-)

    The American tax and retirement systems are a mess, yes, but in their defense they weren't always so.

    Social Security first came about for a variety of reasons, some of the biggest being that the retiring elderly at the time (World War II era) had very few income earning children that could take care of them (mainly men, who were dying in droves abroad). In addition the system, while never perfect, would still be in moderately good shape today if our own government hadn't spent the last 30+ borrowing it all for other programs. The program has almost no actual money in it anymore... just a huge number of IOUs that they are now having to pay back, which they can't, so their borrowing from other countries to cover. Yes, I do believe that Social Security needs to be changed, or gotten rid of, but no matter what happens it's going to be a horribly ugly mess while it all works itself out (over the next 20 to 50 years).

    As for the amount that you're paying in taxes, I am sorry to say that it's only going to get worse the more you make. You mention making over $12,000 for the year, and having to pay over $1,200 in taxes, or about 10% (roughly). I am single (no tax break), have no children (ding as well), and am not a home owner (no break there either), and my total taxes paid out last year came to $13,000 (yes, three zero there), which was roughly 25% of my gross yearly income. Unless things drastically change (which I personally doubt) or you win a major lottery (did you buy a ticket this week?) this is simply the way it is going to be.

    ReplyDelete